Deposition questions for every witness in the file, doctor, plaintiff, and expert.
Deposition prep engine software generates targeted question sets for every witness who matters to the case: treating providers, the plaintiff, and opposing experts. Each question is cited to the specific record fact or inconsistency it's built on, live in beta today for deposing attorneys to test on a real file before they walk into the room.
Three witness types, one cited engine.
The engine reads the record for what each witness type needs to be asked about: treating providers on their own documentation, the plaintiff on the history and functional claims, and opposing experts on the literature and assumptions behind their opinion. Every question traces back to the fact or inconsistency that raised it.
Built from gaps and inconsistencies, not guesses.
Questions are generated from what the record actually shows: a treatment gap, a prior complaint at the same site, an inconsistency between two notes, or a literature mismatch in an expert's opinion. The deposing attorney chooses what to ask — the engine's job is making sure nothing worth asking gets missed.
AI drafts the questions. The attorney asks them.
Deposition Prep Engine builds question sets from cited facts and flagged inconsistencies in the record, but it does not decide what actually gets asked in the room. The deposing attorney reviews every set, cuts what doesn't fit their strategy, and chooses the order and the follow-ups.
No question set is a script, and nothing generated here is asked without the attorney's own judgment first. That is the design: full cited coverage of the record, final call always the attorney's.
How it works.
Three steps, with the attorney choosing what to ask.
Provider documentation, plaintiff history, and opposing expert opinions are analyzed for gaps and inconsistencies.
Targeted questions are generated per witness type, each one linked to the record fact behind it.
Cut, reorder, or add questions, then walk into the deposition with the record's full coverage behind you.
Who preps depositions with it.
Same cited engine, three different witnesses to prepare for.
Prep the treating provider and the plaintiff from the same cited record used to build the case.
For plaintiff firmsPrep cross of the plaintiff and rebuttal of the opposing expert from one engine.
For defense counselProvider depositions built around the standard-of-care questions the record actually raises.
For malpractice workDeposition prep engine, answered.
Three: treating providers, the plaintiff, and opposing experts. Each question set is built for what that witness type actually needs to be asked about, and every question cites the record fact or inconsistency it's built on.
No. It drafts a cited set of candidate questions built from gaps, inconsistencies, and literature mismatches in the record. The deposing attorney reviews, cuts, reorders, and adds — the engine's job is coverage, not strategy.
Yes, in beta. It's live and testable now on real files, and we're refining it hands-on with the attorneys using it early. If your caseload is a good fit, we'll work with you directly.
Deposition Prep Outlines builds a structured outline for a single deposition. Deposition Prep Engine goes further, generating targeted question sets across all three witness types in one file, each cited to the specific fact or inconsistency behind it.
Yes. Every generated set is fully editable, add, remove, or reorder questions freely before you walk into the deposition.
Related capabilities.
Prep tools that share the same cited record.
A structured outline for a single deposition, built from the cited record.
ExploreStress-tests an opposing expert's opinion against the literature and the record before cross.
ExploreMaps likely cross-examination paths from the same inconsistencies and gaps.
ExplorePrep your next deposition on it.
Treating provider, plaintiff, and opposing expert question sets, each cited to the record fact behind it. Join the beta to run it on a real file, or book a demo to see a full set generated.