HomeSolutionsMass Tort Case Review
MASS TORT MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW

Every claimant's records, reviewed against the same criteria — the docket sorts itself.

Mass tort medical record review at docket scale: the same qualification criteria run across every claimant file, every line cited to its source page, record gaps flagged, bellwether candidates surfaced, and plaintiff fact sheets drafted from the same pass. The docket comes back sorted in days — case merit stays yours to judge.

Click any chip → the source page it cites
Docket run · Case screening days, not months
Claimant qualification screen · one criteria set, every file
1,240 claimant files queued queued
312 meet qualification criteria qualify
6 bellwether candidates flagged flagged
Queued 1,240 Qualify 312 Bellwether 6

One docket, one standard of case screening.

The usual answer to a thousand claimant files is a room of contract reviewers working from a checklist, for months, with QA sampling a fraction of the output. Keep the record review with you instead: the same qualification criteria run across every file, every line cited, and the docket comes back sorted in days.

The same deliverable, two ways
Turnaround Months of contract reviewers Days, any docket size
Pricing $0.20–$1.50 / page × thousands of files Flat 10¢ / page
Citations Sampled QA Every line, every file
Data control Records at a BPO Never leave your control
Claimant screen · 1 of 1,240 your criteria
Exposure historyDocumented in pharmacy recordscited
DiagnosisConfirmed in pathology reportcited
Latency windowMet per criteria setcited
Treatment recordsGap in coverage — records missinggap
Case meritNot scored — yours to judgecounsel
Same screen, every file · 312 of 1,240 qualify
How it works

Three steps between intake and a sorted docket.

01

Upload the docket and your criteria

The claimant files you already have, any format, plus the qualification criteria counsel has set for the litigation. In the demo docket, 1,240 claimant files queued in one batch.

02

The AI screens every file, every line cited

The same criteria run uniformly across the whole docket. Each criterion result links to its source page, record gaps are flagged for follow-up, and plaintiff fact sheets draft from the same pass.

03

Counsel reviews the sorted docket

312 files meet criteria, 6 bellwether candidates surface, and every call is yours to confirm: verify any line with a click, then export the results and the fact sheets.

Screening, not scoring

It flags the signal. Counsel makes the call.

The qualification criteria are yours, and case screening runs them the same way on file 1 and file 1,240. Every criterion result carries its source page, so when a file qualifies (or doesn't), you can open the exact record behind it.

What it never does is rank case merit or estimate case value. It flags what the record shows: criteria met, gaps in coverage, bellwether-relevant facts. Which claimants proceed is a judgment the platform leaves with counsel, and the audit trail shows exactly who decided what.

Audit trail · Docket run exportable
Day 1Docket ingested · 1,240 claimant filessystem
Day 1Qualification criteria lockedcounsel
Day 2Record gaps flagged for follow-upsystem
Day 3Screen complete · 312 qualify · 6 bellwethersystem
Day 3Plaintiff fact sheets drafted · per claimantsystem
Day 4Qualification confirmed & exportedcounsel
Every access logged · files deleted 30 days after delivery
Why Medrecords AI

The rules the platform never breaks.

Medrecords AI EVERY LINE CITED
CASE #IME-4812 · ADAMS, T.342 pp
2/14 — ER visit, right knee p.4
4/18 — arthroscopic surgery p.61
p.140 — wrong patient quarantined
Medrecords AI
Read every page · cite every line

HIPAA, under a signed BAA

Every file is handled under our Business Associate Agreement, from the first byte.

Never trains a model

Your records are never used to train any AI model — ours or anyone else's.

Every line cited

If we can't cite it, we don't say it. Every sentence links to its source page.

Deleted after delivery

Files are deleted 30 days after delivery, with a full audit log of every access.

Powered by the platform

Four capabilities behind every screen.

Mass tort case screening is one deliverable of the same platform that reads, sorts, and cites the whole record.

Mass tort batch processing

Queue the whole docket in one batch. Every claimant file gets the same read, the same criteria, and the same citation standard.

IN ACTION · 1,240 claimant files queued → screened in days, one criteria set

Missing records identification

Gaps in treatment or exposure coverage are flagged per claimant, before opposing counsel finds them in discovery.

IN ACTION · 1,240 files screened → gaps flagged per claimant, cited to the record

Medical chronology

A cited timeline per claimant: exposure, diagnosis, treatment, each entry synced to its source page in that file.

IN ACTION · 312 qualifying files → a per-claimant chronology, every entry cited

Custom report builder

Plaintiff fact sheets on the court's form, drafted per claimant from the same screening pass, every field cited.

IN ACTION · same pass → plaintiff fact sheets drafted for the 312 who qualify
FAQ

Mass tort record review and case screening, answered.

No. MedRecords AI does not retrieve records from providers or facilities. You bring the records you already have — review starts in minutes from upload. Retrieval vendors take days; you can keep yours and still cut the review to minutes.

You do. Counsel sets the qualification criteria the litigation requires — exposure, diagnosis, latency, treatment history — and the platform runs that same set uniformly across every claimant file. Every criterion result is cited to its source page, so you can see exactly why a file qualified or didn't.

Yes. Plaintiff fact sheets are drafted from the same screening pass, one per claimant, with every factual field cited to its source page in that claimant's record. Counsel reviews and finalizes each one before it goes out; nothing is served without your sign-off.

No. The platform screens each file against your qualification criteria and flags the signal: criteria met, gaps in the record, bellwether-relevant facts. It never scores case merit or estimates case value. Qualification judgment stays with counsel.

Flat 10¢ a page, whatever the docket size. No per-file minimums, no volume tiers, no contract-reviewer hours. A 1,240-file docket is priced the same way as a single file: by the page, with every line cited.

Screen the docket in days, not quarters.

AI screens. Counsel decides who qualifies.