HomeSolutionsPersonal Injury
Medical record review for personal injury

Every injury, treatment, and dollar — cited to the page.

Demand support that survives scrutiny: complete specials, a clean treatment narrative, and the priors question answered before the defense asks it.

Demand support · Doe v. Roe specials
$84,210 in specials — every line cited
ER + surgical — $61,300, itemized to billingp.402–418
PT — 24 sessions, $14,880, treatment narrative cleanp.201
Priors search — none documented✓ p.06
Chronology attached as Exhibit 3ready
The priors question, answered before the defense asks
The status quo

PI cases are won and lost in the medical record — the prior injury, the 47-day gap, the inconsistent history. Manual review is slow, costly, and prone to miss exactly those facts.

2–5 days
of records work per demand
by hand
how specials get assembled
1
prior you’d rather find first

Get the defensible blueprint — without assembling it yourself.

Everything you need to assess the case — structured, surfaced, and sourced. Medrecords organizes the file, pulls the key medical facts, and builds summaries backed by citations, so your team works on strategy, not sorting.

Case summary · auto-drafted
p.12 p.47 p.118

Summaries: the whole case in one view

A complete, structured summary that surfaces delayed care, missing records, and conflicting narratives — every claim traced back to the page it came from.

Chronology · by date
Feb 11X-Ray — Chest
Apr 02Progress Note
May 22MRI — Cervical imaging placed inline
Jun 01Gap in care · 47 days
Jul 17Consultation Report

Automated chronology: every event in order

Every page placed by date, provider, and event — with imaging inline and gaps flagged. Scroll the case instead of hunting through PDFs.

Duplicate sets · 4Match similarity
Ambulance Call ReportmultipleReview
Consultation Report84%Review
Progress Note87%Review
Remove all duplicates

Indexing & dedup: a clean, searchable file

Medrecords detects duplicates, flags mismatches, and separates unrelated claimants — so the file you build on is one you can search, filter, and trust.

Cross-checked · multi-modelCase #12345
Patient nameJane Doe
Date of birth1985-04-15
DiagnosisRight arm fracture
Diagnosis codeS42.301A
Surgery date2024-10-07

Built to be verified — not just believed

Multiple models cross-check every extraction. Each field carries its citation and a confidence score, and low-confidence pulls are flagged — so your verification is a click, not a re-read.

Adapts to each claim

Built for the injury case.

Liability, causation, damages — the whole dispute runs through the medical record. Medrecords gives you the structured, cited version of it.

Intake · Case 2025-0412 reading — p. 1,462 / 1,847
PDF ED_records · 214 pp DOC ortho_chart · 1,128 pp JPG nurse_note · flagged
Multi-model read · dedupe · claimant split · index
1,847 pp in 612 unique 14 flagged 1 DICOM study
Organized recordby provider · date
01Jul 17Medical Records
02Jul 17Billing Statements
03Aug 06Physician Notes
612 pp indexed · every row citedopen the case →

Catch the prior injury before the other side does

Pre-existing conditions, earlier claims, and inconsistent histories surfaced and cited — the facts that reframe causation, found early.

Damages traced to the page

Every treatment, charge, and course of care linked to its source — support for demands and defenses that survives scrutiny.

Who this is for

The other side has read the priors. Have you?

PI turns on who knows the record better. Medrecords reads all of it — the priors, the gaps, the inconsistent histories — and hands you the cited version before strategy is set.

Prior injuries and inconsistencies surfaced first
Damages and treatment traced to the page
Cited support for demands and defenses alike
Record intelligence · Doe v. Roe cited
Priors search — 2 earlier claims found2019 · 2021
History conflict — ER intake vs. PCP notep.88 · p.412
Specials — $84,210 traced to billingitemized
Chronology attached to demandEx. 3
Know the record better than the other side
The objection

"We already have paralegals for this."

Keep them — as reviewers, not readers. Staff verify cited findings in minutes instead of assembling them for days, the specials arrive complete, and the demand goes out this week instead of next month.

New · Case Outcome Benchmarks

What's the case worth? Answer with a cohort, not a hunch.

Success-likelihood and value ranges built from comparable resolved cases — matched on injury, treatment, and venue — with every case-side driver cited to your record. Kept in a work-product workspace, never in the evidence file.

Explore Outcome Benchmarks
Valuation · Ochoa v. Delgadowork product · separate file
Success likelihood72–81%
Indicated range$145k–$240k · median $186k
+Objective imaging — 4.2 mm herniationMRI·s3·sl18
+ESI injection + surgical consultp.318
6-week treatment gapflag §4
+No documented priorsp.06
1,284 comparable resolved cases · TX venues · 2019–2026ranges, not promises

Build one demand with it.

Your next case. Compare it against your current process — specials, narrative, and priors, cited.