Nine chart types litigators actually ask for — one template library.
Litigation chart packages cover the nine chart types litigators actually ask for — comparative charts, treatment charts, pain and medication graphs, injury timelines, and more. All nine are built from Custom Report Builder's template engine rather than nine separate tools, and every data point is cited to its page and source, so each chart can survive cross-examination.
The nine charts, named.
Litigation teams request the same exhibits over and over, so they live in one library: comparative injury, treatment summary, pain and suffering, medication timeline, injury timeline, prior-versus-post comparison, provider encounter, billing and damages, and treatment gap. Pick what the case needs; skip what it doesn't.
Assemble the packet the case actually needs.
A soft-tissue case wants the pain graph and treatment gap chart; a surgical case wants the injury timeline and damages chart. Choose per case, and the selected charts assemble into one exhibit-ready packet with consistent formatting and a shared citation index.
One template engine underneath.
Here's the honest architecture: all nine charts are templates built on the same engine as Custom Report Builder. Not nine tools with nine pipelines — one extraction pass, one source-verified dataset, nine ways to render it.
That's why the medication graph never contradicts the treatment chart: they're two views of the same data, not two tools' opinions.
Charts built to survive cross-examination.
A chart without citations is an exhibit waiting to be challenged. Every plotted point, bar, and row here traces to the page and source it came from, and anything the engine couldn't read with confidence is flagged rather than graphed. The chart argues nothing; it shows what the record says, with receipts.
See how citations workFrom record to exhibit packet.
Three steps — no spreadsheet gymnastics, no design software.
One extraction pass reads the whole file — pain scores, medications, treatments, bills, dates.
Choose any of the nine templates the case calls for — singly or as a packet.
Charts arrive as drafts with every data point cited — you verify, adjust, and export.
Who builds chart packages.
Built for legal teams — the exhibits change, the engine doesn't.
Pain graphs and damages charts for the demand package and mediation.
For PI firmsTreatment gap and prior-versus-post charts that show what the record actually supports.
For defense teamsInjury timelines and provider encounter charts for expert review and trial prep.
For med-mal teamsLitigation charts, answered.
Comparative injury chart, treatment summary chart, pain and suffering graph, medication timeline graph, injury timeline chart, prior-versus-post-incident comparison, provider encounter chart, billing and damages chart, and treatment gap chart. They're templates in one library, so a new case can generate any of them from the same processed record.
The engine extracts every documented pain score, functional limitation, and subjective complaint from the record and plots them over time, each point cited to the note it came from. The chart shows what the record says, page by page — it doesn't editorialize, because the jury argument is your job, not the software's.
Yes. Pick the chart types the case needs — say, an injury timeline, a medication graph, and a billing chart — and the package assembles them into one exhibit-ready packet with a shared citation index. One case, one packet, consistent formatting throughout.
No — and that's deliberate. All nine are templates on Custom Report Builder's engine, drawing from the same extracted, source-verified case data. That's why the medication graph and the treatment chart never contradict each other: they're two views of one dataset, not two tools' opinions.
Every one. Each plotted point, bar, and row traces to the page and source document it came from, so a chart can be handed to opposing counsel or an expert with its receipts attached. A chart without citations is an exhibit waiting to be challenged; these are built the other way.
Related capabilities.
Charts are one output of the case file — here's what pairs with them.
The parent engine — your own templates, formats, and letterhead.
See report builderThe demand draft the chart packet usually rides along with.
See demand lettersCited outlines for questioning, built from the same case data.
See prep outlinesTestimony summarized and cited — the companion to the medical exhibits.
See deposition digestSee a chart package built from one of your own cases.
Upload a file and get back a cited sample chart — or book a quick demo and pick the nine apart. Handled under our BAA; never used to train a model.