HomeSolutionsRECA Claim Documentation Review
RECA CLAIM DOCUMENTATION REVIEW

A 2% fee cap and a 31 December 2027 deadline.

RECA claim documentation review checks a uranium worker, downwinder, or onsite-participant file against 28 CFR Part 79, which names the exact pathology and diagnostic evidence each compensable disease requires. We check the file against that list before the claim goes to DOJ, not after it comes back denied for evidence that was missing from the start.

Click any row → the source page it cites
Claim file · Case #IME-4812 filing-ready
Adams, Timothy · RECA claim file
342 pp / 2 packets received logged
11 duplicate pages removed free
p.140 — wrong patient quarantined
Pages 342 Documents 27 Cited 100%

The rulebook is published. So is the referee.

We do not build for a case type until we can name the standard that defines a correct output and the person who grades the file against it. In RECA claims work, both are already in federal statute and regulation — and the 2025 reauthorization means volume is rising fast, with an estimated 30,000–80,000 claims expected in the 29-month filing window.

The rulebook and the referee
The rulebook
  • 42 USC §2210 note — the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act
  • 28 CFR Part 79 — enumerates by disease exactly what pathology and diagnostic evidence is acceptable
  • Pub. L. 119-21 — the 2025 reauthorization, enacted 4 July 2025, that reopened and extended the program
The referee
  • The DOJ Civil Division, which issues a written approval or denial
  • A denial that specifies the evidentiary deficiency, not just a rejection
  • Administrative appeal and re-filing — binary, itemised, fast
Attorney fees capped at 2% of the award on an initial claim, 10% on a resubmission — record review has to fit inside that margin Flat 10¢/page here, duplicates free
Evidence review · Case #IME-4812 cited 100%
Packet342 pp / 2 packets · 11 deduplicatedlogged
Compensable diseaseChecked against 28 CFR Part 79checked
Exposure historySite, dates & role extractedcited
Evidentiary gapsFlagged before DOJ sees themflagged
Eligibility / categoryNot produced — DOJ decidesDOJ
342 pages reviewed · cited 100% · no eligibility calls, no filings
How it works

Three steps between the file and DOJ.

01

Send the file

Claim intake records, exposure history, and diagnostic files, as they actually arrive, in any format. In the demo case, 342 pages across 2 packets, with a wrong-patient page quarantined before the read starts.

02

The AI checks it against 28 CFR Part 79, every line cited

Compensable-disease pathology, diagnostic evidence, and exposure site and dates, extracted and matched against the regulation's requirements — page-cited, not summarized from memory.

03

You file, DOJ decides

The review supports the claim your attorney files, inside the 2% initial-filing fee cap. The DOJ Civil Division issues a written approval or denial that specifies any evidentiary deficiency.

The boundary, in writing

A documentation review that knows it isn't the determination.

We check the file against 28 CFR Part 79 and cite what supports the claim and what's missing. We do not determine eligibility, assign a compensation category, or file the claim — those decisions belong to the DOJ Civil Division, the claimant, and their attorney.

In the demo case, page 140 turned out to belong to a different patient. The review flags it and quarantines it in its own line, instead of folding it silently into the file DOJ receives.

Audit trail · Case #IME-4812 exportable
08:12Packet received · 342 pp / 2 packetssystem
08:3111 pages deduplicatedsystem
08:44p.140 flagged — wrong patientsystem
08:54Evidence review complete · 27 documents · cited 100%system
09:20Review verified · citations checkedreviewer
09:26Review exported · claim filing handled off-platformreviewer
Every access logged · file deleted 30 days after delivery
Why Medrecords AI

The rules the platform never breaks.

Medrecords AI EVERY LINE CITED
CASE #IME-4812 · ADAMS, T.342 pp
2/14 — ER visit, right knee p.4
4/18 — arthroscopic surgery p.61
p.140 — wrong patient quarantined
Medrecords AI
Read every page · cite every line

HIPAA, under a signed BAA

Every file is handled under our Business Associate Agreement, from the first byte.

Never trains a model

Your records are never used to train any AI model — ours or anyone else's.

Every line cited

If we can't cite it, we don't say it. Every sentence links to its source page.

Deleted after delivery

Files are deleted 30 days after delivery, with a full audit log of every access.

Powered by the platform

Four capabilities behind every evidence review.

The RECA evidence review is one deliverable of the same platform that reads, sorts, and cites the whole record.

Medical Records OCR

Every exposure record and diagnostic file read in full — PDFs, scans, handwritten clinic notes — nothing skipped, nothing guessed.

IN ACTION · 342 pp / 2 packets → 27 documents, read in full

Medical Chronology

The exposure and treatment timeline builds itself from the claim file and supplemental records, synced to every source page.

IN ACTION · 2/14 ER visit → 4/18 surgery, one continuous timeline

Verifiable AI Citations

If we can't cite it, we don't say it. Every pathology and diagnostic finding links to the page range it was pulled from.

IN ACTION · 27 documents → cited 100%

Medical Summary Reports

The evidence review formats straight into the documentation your attorney files with DOJ — your template, your letterhead.

IN ACTION · evidence review → filing-ready export
FAQ

RECA claim documentation review, answered.

No. We organize and cite the exposure and diagnosis records behind the claim. Eligibility, compensation category, and award amount are determined by the Department of Justice Civil Division — we never make that determination and never file or sign on the claimant's behalf.

Pub. L. 119-21, the 2025 reauthorization, set the filing deadline at 31 December 2027. That is a legal filing deadline, not a document-review deadline, and we don't give legal advice about it. What we can do is get the documentation ready well ahead of it.

28 CFR Part 79 lists, disease by disease, the exact pathology and diagnostic evidence DOJ will accept as proof of a compensable condition. We check the file against that list line by line before the claim goes in, so a missing report or an unsupported diagnosis surfaces before DOJ sees it, not after a denial.

Yes. The 2025 amendments extended coverage to all of Utah, Idaho, and New Mexico, plus Manhattan Project waste zip codes in Missouri, Tennessee, Alaska, and Kentucky. The same documentation review applies to downwinder, onsite-participant, and uranium-worker files tied to any covered site or zip code.

No. Medrecords AI does not retrieve records from providers or facilities. You bring the records you already have — review starts in minutes from upload. Retrieval vendors take days; you can keep yours and still cut the review to minutes.

Send one file. We'll tell you what we can read.

No obligation. If the case type is buildable we'll scope it; if it isn't, we'll say so.