A Listing, or a grid rule. The file decides which.
SSA disability record review pulls every lab value, RFC-relevant finding and treating-source opinion out of the medical evidence of record and maps them to the five-step sequence — for ALJ hearings, for DDS determinations, and for continuing disability reviews graded under the medical improvement review standard.
The most explicit rubric in American administrative law.
We do not build for a case type until we can name the standard that defines a correct output and the person who grades the file against it. Social Security disability publishes both, down to a printed lookup table.
That is what makes the record work tractable. The rules are fixed and public; what varies is whether the evidence to satisfy them was ever found in the file.
Thousands of pages, arriving in pieces, mostly unreadable at speed.
A hearing-level file runs from about 400 pages to 5,000, with the middle of the range near 2,700. It does not arrive at once: the DDS folder lands first, treating records trickle in through the wait for a hearing date, and post-hearing submissions land after the record was supposed to be closed.
What makes it slow is not length alone. It is re-faxed clinic notes, handwritten progress sheets, and the same intake packet resubmitted by every source that ever treated the claimant.
- 2,086,885 initial decisions
- 289,492 ALJ dispositions
- 1,342,105 medical continuing disability reviews
- 45,641 at the Appeals Council
- 15,753 in federal court
Four steps, and the first one is a real file.
We do not sell a roadmap for a case type we have not read. The build starts from evidence you already hold and stops if the read does not hold up.
Send one real file
A hearing-level medical evidence of record set, or a CDR file with its comparison point records, in whatever shape it arrived. In the demo case that was 342 pages across 2 productions, with a wrong-patient page quarantined before the read started.
We return the read
A source-by-source index, the listing-level findings and the function evidence, every line cited to the page it came from. You check it against the file you already know, which is the only honest way to judge a read.
We scope the build
Your output template, your exhibit conventions, and the fields your briefs and pre-hearing memos actually use. If the case type is not buildable to that standard, we say so instead of shipping something that has to be re-checked line by line.
You run it
Your team runs files through it and reviews every output before it leaves the office. The platform organizes, cites and surfaces. The theory of the case, the listing argument and the grid application stay with the representative.
The rules the platform never breaks.
EVERY LINE CITED
HIPAA, under a signed BAA
Every file is handled under our Business Associate Agreement, from the first byte.
Never trains a model
Your records are never used to train any AI model — ours or anyone else's.
Every line cited
If we can't cite it, we don't say it. Every sentence links to its source page.
Deleted after delivery
Files are deleted 30 days after delivery, with a full audit log of every access.
Four capabilities behind every SSA read.
The SSA disability record review is one deliverable of the same platform that reads, sorts, and cites the whole record.
Medical Chronology
The treatment timeline builds itself across every production, so the alleged onset date and the comparison point sit on one continuous record.
Smart List View
Filter the record down to one source, one date window or one impairment, which is how an exhibit index gets built without paging through the whole file.
Work Limitation Extraction
Every restriction a treating source actually wrote down, pulled out of the narrative and cited, so the RFC evidence is visible instead of buried.
Condition Progression Tracking
Clinical metrics trended over time across sources, which is the shape a continuing disability review needs when the question is what changed since the comparison point.
SSA disability record review, answered.
Send one file. We'll tell you what we can read.
No obligation. If the case type is buildable we'll scope it; if it isn't, we'll say so.