NewWe now read the actual MRI and CT imaging — not just the radiologist's 1-page report. See how →

Content Hub › Compare

AMA Guides 5th vs 6th Edition — Impairment Rating Comparison

The AMA Guides 6th Edition changed impairment rating from the 5th's diagnosis-based approach toward a more standardized, diagnosis-plus-functional-loss model — and which edition applies depends entirely on the state.

3 sections·4 sources·Verified 2026-08-15 ✓
01

What changed in the 6th

The 6th introduced a consistent impairment-class and grade framework, whole-person impairment calculation, and stronger functional focus. The 2024/2025 digital updates revised the musculoskeletal and nervous-system chapters — training is offered by ACOEM and others.

02

State adoption

California uses the 5th (Labor Code 4660). Pennsylvania requires the 6th (2nd printing 2009). Tennessee's approved training list mandates 6th Edition training. Florida uses its own schedule. Verify the edition per state before rating.

03

Why it matters

The same clinical findings can produce different ratings across editions — the exact source of cross-examiner disputes.

Rating basis by jurisdiction10 states profiled

Which edition applies is a jurisdictional fact, not a physician preference. Of the 10 states profiled in this hub, 1 works to the 5th, 2 require the 6th, 4 leave the edition to the agency, and 2 use their own schedule instead of the AMA Guides at all.

Key facts

5th Edition (2000)

California standard (LC 4660); DRE/ROM spine methods; diagnosis-based

6th Edition (2008/2023)

Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Montana and others; standardized methodology aligned with ICF

2023/2025 updates

Musculoskeletal chapters (upper limb, lower limb, spine) and nervous system updated

Key takeaway

Edition choice is jurisdictional, not physician preference

Sources

How Medrecords AI does this work

Medrecords AI reads the same records these platforms handle. The difference is what comes back: a sorted, deduplicated file with a citation on every line, and a human deciding what it means. Judge it against the comparison above.

Test it on a file you already have.
Send one real record set. You get back a cited chronology and decide for yourself whether the read holds up — no obligation either way.

Explore the Content Hub

Medrecords AIMedrecords AI

Minutes per file. Every line cited. 10¢ a page.

Bring the hardest file from this page. Get a cited chronology and a report draft in minutes — every line traced to its source page, ready for your review and signature.

  • Minutes per file, not days
  • Every line cited to its source page
  • Flat 10¢/page, duplicates free — no license, no minimums
  • HIPAA-eligible · SOC 2 audit-ready
Test on a file Book a demo

See how Medrecords AI compares with anything on this page — over a 30-minute call, side by side.

Last verified: 2026-08-15